Chris Keam : accomplished copywriter & video editor

Thursday, October 16, 2008

What About The Children?

Sustainability is the new black when it comes to catch-phrases. And rightly so. But, are we serious about paying more than lip-service to the concept? We'll get a better idea of how much commitment local governments have to the idea in March, when transportation consultant Richard Gilbert's guidelines for sustainable transportation and children are finalized.  In conjunction with kidsonthemove.ca, Gilbert is developing a set of recommendations (pdf) for planners and developers which attempt to put children first when considering the design of our transportation infrastructure.

The Granby family, Granville St. Bridge
Vancouver Critical Mass, June 2006

There's a lot of great ideas contained within the 27 recommendations so far... and probably quite a hefty bill for the public purse as well. After all, are we willing to keep low enrollment schools open so that kids can limit their school bus riding time to just 40 minutes per day? It's the kind of decision that's going to show up on your tax return. Can we show the fortitude to make auto-makers redesign vehicles, in light of the fact that 70% of car exhausts in the country point toward the sidewalk... and directly in the faces of kids walking or in strollers? Are we going to make public transit safe and inviting enough that preteens can travel on buses and subways without a parent?

Of course it's one of those pay-now or pay-later conundrums and frankly, we seem like pay-later kind of people (as a society) when it comes to reaching for our wallets to address social issues. There's no doubt we have the ability to fulfill this suggestion by former Bogota mayor Enrique Penalosa, "If we can build a successful city for children we will have a successful city for all people."

But, do we have the will?

Labels: , , ,


Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Betty Got My Ballot

Threw away my vote today. If you think that voting on principle, rather than probability of victory, is wasting your ballot. It felt grand. Tossed it aside the same way a cigarette smoker casually grinds out their butt and walks away from that tiny tube of non-biodegradable whatever that cigarette filters contain. 

Coulda spoiled it, or voted for the Marxist/Leninists -- to really thumb my nose at the conventional wisdom. But hey, if a great-grandmother who's willing to go to jail to protect the environment and thumb her nose at the so-called justice system doesn't deserve a few Xs on election day I don't know who is. No offense intended for the NDP incumbent in my riding, but she's probably a lock for the job, so why not vote for someone whose platform is so sensible it couldn't be seen as anything other than extreme in this crazy, mixed-up world?

A rainbow. Just because.


Labels: , , , ,


Friday, October 10, 2008

The Montreal Mistake: Jack Layton's Grand Prix Gaffe

NDP leader Jack Layton says he'll throw taxpayer money at the Montreal Grand Prix in the hopes of keeping the event alive. Bad, bad idea. So, I wrote a letter to tell him so (see below).

This image was shot at 3:30am in January 2008 a half block from my houseThe young woman inside the car (split in two when it hit a tree) died on impact. I believe "Zoom, Zoom" car advertising and auto racing are in part to blame for the carnage on our streets. Glamourizing excessive speed costs society. Who profits?

Mr Layton:

I am aghast that you would consider for even a moment to spend taxpayers' money to encourage Formula One boss billionaire Bernie Ecclestone to bring his blood-sport celebration of automobiles back to Montreal. There was the same hue and cry over the Vancouver Indy race a few years back, and yet, have you heard of a single hotel closing because it (the Indy) no longer creates a week of traffic hassles and noise pollution so that motorheads can worship at an altar prominently emblazoned with the logos of car, cigarette, and alcohol manufacturers?

If you must spend money on tourism, I suggest you look a little harder. Perhaps the Montreal Bike Festival? Surely the world's largest bike festival with in excess of 45,000 participants (as opposed to spectators) could use some cash? I can only hope you are pandering to Quebec voters with this position, as it's the lesser of two evils at this point. I would be sorely disappointed to find out you consider promoting automobile use to be within the NDP's supposedly progressive platform. As a former video editor at a Vancouver news station I have seen report after report of people killed by excessive speed and street racing. How do you think the (primarily) young men responsible for this carnage get their perception that racing is cool and glamorous in the first place? Car racing may be good for the local economy (a debatable point) but it also most certainly destroys lives and families.

Why don't you go visit Ms. Nina Rivet of Vancouver and tell her your plans? Then she can show you the pictures of her sister, killed by a young man with a need for speed. Perhaps a look at a few coroners' photos and a calculation of the negative economic impact of irresponsible car use might encourage you to rethink this terrible idea?

If the FI community, sponsors, and the poor, poor auto makers such as Mercedes, Ferrari, BMW, Toyota, Honda, etc, etc want to race in Montreal so badly, let them find the money from private donors. If you are serious about helping the Quebec economy then I strongly suggest to you that the money would be better spent promoting activities and industries with a future. Auto racing is not among them. Your position on this is a total contradiction of what I (as an NDP voter who is inches away from switching his vote to the Green Party) thought you represented.

I expect way, way better from you Jack. I am made absolutely livid by this news.

I'd say I'm left at a loss for words regarding this issue, but clearly I am not. Please build your party by sticking to your principles, not by offering pay-offs to fickle voters who are only looking for short-term solutions to systemic problems.

Sincerely,

Chris Keam

Thursday, October 9, 2008

So Very Opted Out!

You may recall I mentioned ioptout.ca in my post about the do not call list last week.

Today I received an email from the service outlining just which companies are now forbidden to call me. This is a level of service the gov't list isn't offering. Further, if I review the list and see some organization that I don't mind hearing from, I can edit and update my list down the road. Have you received an unwanted phone call from anyone listed below? You can do something about it!

- Heart and Stroke Foundation
- UNICEF Canada
- Childrens Emergency Foundation
- Childrens Health Foundation
- Save the Children Canada
- Canadian Diabetes Association
- TD Canada Trust
- Bell Canada
- Shaw Communications
- Globe and Mail, The
- National Post
- Vancouver Province
- Conservative Party of Canada
- Green Party of Canada
- Liberal Party of Canada
- Libertarian Party of Canada
- New Democratic Party of Canada
- New Democratic Party of British Columbia
- Compas
- Environics Research Group
- Gallup Canada
- Ipsos Canada
- Leger Marketing
- Pollara
- SOM
- Ekos
- Chapters/Indigo Books
- Brick, The
- Mountain Equipment Co-Op
- Consumer Contact
- J.D. Power and Associates
- R.A. Malatest & Associates
- Mustel Group
- MD Analytics
- BBM Canada
- Teleperformance Canada
- Bristol Omnifacts Research
- NRG Research Group
- Gemma Communications
- Mountain West Research Center
- Air Canada
- BC Blind Sports and Recreation Association
- Central Mountain Air
- Prince George Citizen
- Canadian Cancer Society (British Columbia)
- BC SPCA
- British Columbia Libertarian Party
- Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
- Canadian Western Bank
- Fido Solutions
- Greenpeace Canada
- Columbia House Canada
- Capital One Canada
- Le Droit
- Rogers
- Canadian Red Cross
- Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
- Médecins Sans Frontières Canada
- Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
- Canadian Feed the Children
- Bank of Montreal

Labels: , , ,


Monday, October 6, 2008

The Commuter Bike Shopper's Checklist


I've created a shopping checklist that one can use to estimate the cost to upgrade a current bike to an all-weather, year-round commuting machine, or compare costs to equip a new bike for the same purpose. Email me at info@chriskeam.com for a printer-friendly pdf version that you can take with you when bike shopping!




Brodie's Section.8 is a great example of
the new breed of bikes built for commuting.
www.brodiebikes.com

The Bike
Your best choice if buying a brand-new commuter bike is a model with 700c size wheels. These are the same size wheels road racing and touring bikes use. They are faster and lighter than 26 inch mountain bike wheels and better suited to commuter riding. Converting a road bike by swapping the racing style ‘drop’ bars for riser, or cruiser style handlebars, is another fine option. If you are going to use a mountain bike, replace the off-road knobby tires with 1.5 inch street tires. You’ll gain speed, control, and day-to-day puncture-resistance.

Rear Light
By far the most important piece of safety equipment you should have installed on your bike. They are cheap and ubiquitous. Buy a couple. Attach at least one to your bike and keep the other to clip onto clothes or a dead-sexy safety vest.

Front Light
If you’re commuting in the city, all you really need is the small, cheap, white LED blinky. Add candlepower depending on your financial tolerance and urge to be seen. An easy-to-use quick release can come in handy.

Fenders
Get the black plastic and steel kind that attach to your frame at three or four points. Unlike the ones that stick out from your seat post, or the motocross style plastic fenders designed for use with front suspension, they actually keep your feet and butt relatively dry. Beware of potential hassles with disc brakes when buying a brand-new bike.


Rack
Look for a nice one? Make sure it will work with your bike and doesn’t limit your choice of panniers.

Panniers
Rubberized, roll-top super-waterproof panniers are awesome. Regular panniers with your stuff inside shopping bags will do as good a job unless you regularly ride in typhoons. More importantly, the easier they are to take on and off, the more likely you’ll use them.

Bell/horn
You can tinkle, or toot, or yell in a pinch. The bell is our first pick because it’s friendly. More than a few commuters have a bell and a horn. Room on the handlebars for both is sometimes an issue.

Lock
Buy the best one you can afford and use it. Always. If you don’t know how, get the bike store or a knowledgeable friend to show you how to lock the both the frame and front tire to a bike rack for maximum security.

Rain Wear
If you want to go fast, get the sleek, form-fitting stuff. Booties to go over your regular riding shoes make a very big difference, keeping toes both dryer and warmer. If you don’t plan on breaking speed records or a sweat, just use your most waterproof rain coat (or buy one) and rain-pants that you can put on over your regular work clothes. Rubber boots, which are incidentally the latest fashion, are also the best choice for footwear. Take your regular shoes with you, or leave a pair at work.


Labels: , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]